Search for: "Does 1-18"
Results 521 - 540
of 22,288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
Johnson and Johnson, Case 1:24-cv-00671 (D.N.J. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
On 18 May 2020, the Lithuania State Data Protection Inspectorate began an investigation into the collection and use of personal data by and for use of the app. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
The LSE Media Blog has an article on the role of disinformation in political campaigning and its impact on voters, arguing it does not have the sway on elections that is often assumed. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
Letter 1 is signed by former DEA administrators and Directors of National Drug Policy. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 8:58 am
Initially, he was found a room at 18 Wren Street in Coventry, but on 19 May 2021 he was instead provided with a room at 133 Terry Road, Coventry. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
Pursuant to Article 18(1) EUTMR, genuine use of an EU trade mark can still be achieved through use of the mark in a different form, so long as it only differs in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered.Noah Clothing's position was that the addition of the upper-case letter "Y" followed by a full stop (as shown in the Second Mark) altered the distinctive character of the Mark for the purposes of… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:27 pm
It also likely means that the defendant does not have a history of violent crime or other criminal offenses. [read post]
Witness Giving Contradictory Evidence (s. 136(1)) Charges in Canada: Offences, Defences, Punishments
9 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm
Definition of evidence (2) Notwithstanding the definition evidence in section 118, evidence, for the purposes of this section, does not include evidence that is not material. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
On August 18, 2020, GM Field Service Engineer (FSE) Robert A. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:36 am
So, what does she hope for when people see the statue? [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The addition of the policy statement is driven in part by the OCC’s determination that the Comptroller’s Licensing Manual does not adequately describe “all of the OCC’s considerations regarding the BMA statutory factors and its related processes such as considerations for holding public meetings. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
(2/18/21). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:25 pm
[Trump clearly makes this argument in his reply brief, however—see the three paragraphs on pp. 17-18.] [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:12 am
How can you apply for it, and what does life in South Korea look like? [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
First of all, they are insufficient, particularly for those of us who approach The Collaborative Constitution wondering why it is that her work does not reserve a major role for "We the People" (this is to say, why it does no reserve a major role for the authors of the Constitution, and the “demos” referred to in the very idea of “democracy”). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:34 am
” It does this by prohibiting any action that hinders individuals from reporting potential securities law violations to the SEC. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely: He didn’t devote any space to it.[1] His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:26 am
The CNIL, however, is more specific on this point in step 1 of its draft guide. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
