Search for: "Does 1-21" Results 521 - 540 of 17,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2011, 10:34 am
Salviatus represents the traditional Christian view. 1. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 9:01 am by HRWatchdog
Employers who hired an employee after January 31 could still use the old form, but starting May 1, 2020, all employers must use the new Form I-9, which is dated 10/21/19 and expires 10/31/2022. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:18 pm
Moreover, they are apparently in contempt of a district court's order forbidding them from bringing actions against unrelated individuals, contrary to the joinder provisions of F.R.Civ.P. 20 and 21. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 5:54 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Claims 1, 21 and 22 are identical to claims 1, 21 and 22 of the main request before the opposition division, and claim 20 is identical to claim 20 of auxiliary request 1 allowed by the opposition division (for the wording of these claims, see point III. above).XIII. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:20 am
"The train to Haar - new location of the EBAThe consequences if the appeal does not comply with Article 108 EPC are provided by Rule 101(1) EPC: "If the appeal does not comply with Articles 106 to 108, Rule 97 or Rule 99, paragraph 1(b) or (c) or paragraph 2, the Board of Appeal shall reject it as inadmissible, unless any deficiency has been remedied before the relevant period under Article 108 has expired. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 12:00 am by Nico Cordes
Claim 1 of the present application includes the generic expressions"a sensing circuit comprising at least first and second sensing capacitors", and"at least one mimicking capacitor".Claim 1 does not specify whether there are any transistors. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 1:07 pm by Daniel Shaviro
But, for each $100 of stock options granted, (2) is $21 worse than (1) for the employer (all else equal), albeit $37 better for the employee.Not to worry, however - both are better off under (2) than they would have been under (1) so long as the option grant is between $21 and $37 smaller (per $100 of options that would otherwise have been granted) under (2) than it would have been had they chosen (1).Obviously further legal analysis is required before… [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 1:57 am by Rose Hughes
However, the decision does leave open the question of how broadly "impaired" should be construed. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:53 pm by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
IN-HOUSE SURVEY RESULTS: Examination Quality is "Excellent" or Very Good" EPO - 70% USPTO - 56% JPO - 54% KIPO (Korea) - 25% SIPO (China) - 18% Overall, Patent Quality Has Improved/Stayed the Same/Gotten Worse EPO: improved = 26%, stayed the same = 71%, got worse = 3% USPTO: improved = 23%, stayed the same = 61%, got worse = 16% JPO: improved = 17%, stayed the same = 78%, got worse = 5% KIPO: improved = 34%, stayed the same = 61%, got worse = 5% SIPO: improved = 58%, stayed the same =… [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm by GWS Law
Wickes Building Supplies Ltd v Blair (No.2: Costs) [2020] EWCA Civ 17; [2020] 1 WLR 1246 at [21, 28-29]) CA endorsed Parker v Butler Howe v Motor Insurers’ Bureau (No. 2) [2017] EWCA Civ 932; [2018] 1 W.L.R. 923. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:27 am by Krzysztof Pacula
How does the anchor defendant mechanism operate in the realm of EU trade marks and actions on trade mark infringement? [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:17 pm
For example, an individual who spent exactly 124 days in the US this year and the previous two years would have a total of 187 days under the substantial presence test: This Year: 124 x 1= 124 Last Year: 124 x 1/3= 42 2 Yrs Ago: 124 x 1/6= 21 Total= 187 days. [read post]