Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 521 - 540
of 9,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
However, since D.C. is not a state and does not have a governor, the president has the authority to activate the DCNG. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:49 pm
Under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
Patent No. 7,287,109 (the ’109 Patent) under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 9:35 pm
” In re Gleave, 560F.3d 1331, 1334–35 (Fed. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 2:22 pm
Of particularrelevance, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 12:59 am
Cir. 2018), obviousness-type double patenting does not invalidate a patent that has a later expiry date due to PTE (35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 10:28 am
The following questions are presented for the en banc panel: 1. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 5:00 am
The Military Times did report that 35% of respondents said they were Protestant, 29% were Catholic, 7% were Evangelical Christian, 2% were Mormon, 1% were Jewish, 0% were Muslim, 13% were Other, and 12% had No Preference. [read post]
1 May 2017, 7:55 am
” 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
The judge reasoned that § 3553(a) is mandatory, without providing any exception for resentencings under Rule 35(b); the plain wording of Rule 35(b)(1) does not preclude considering other factors; the advisory committee notes to Rule 35(b)(1) support the conclusion; in applying Rule 35(b)(1), courts are to look for guidance to cases applying 5K1.1, which, as noted above, in this circuit apply all … [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:28 am
" Practice Tip #2: The FDA's ANDA process for generic drugs has been abbreviated such that, in general, the generic drug seeking approval does not require pre-clinical (animal and in vitro) testing. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:23 am
Nash, On the Ownership of Academic Presentations: The Evolution of California Education Code Sections 66450-66452, 35 McGeorge L. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:23 am
Nash, On the Ownership of Academic Presentations: The Evolution of California Education Code Sections 66450-66452, 35 McGeorge L. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:43 pm
§ 271(e)(1) “does not apply to information that may be routinely reported to the FDA, long after marketing approval has been obtained. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:30 am
Section 1. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 5:30 am
Section 1. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
See CRPC Rule 1-100 and its implied exclusion of non-lawyers not employed/contracted by lawyers. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
Id. at *35. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 11:11 am
Additionally, MCL 205.22 requires that an appeal of an assessment be brought within 35 days of that assessment, and MCL 205.28(1) requires service of that assessment upon the taxpayer. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:10 am
In that respect, the court noted (as also previously stated by the EUIPO) that, according to settled case-law, the application of Article 7(1)(c) of the EUTMR does not depend on the existence of a real, current or serious need to leave a sign free. [read post]
