Search for: "Does 15-96" Results 521 - 540 of 984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2022, 1:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
While the individual income tax does not affect the traditional C corporations analyzed in Location Matters, it matters to many Missouri employers. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Maher v Hayduk, 218 AD2d 700]Dismissal of a tenured elementary school principal with an “unblemished record for over 15 years” for failing to accurately track revenues and expenditures, and concealing deficits, while serving as a probationary Assistant Superintendent for Business. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Maher v Hayduk, 218 AD2d 700]Dismissal of a tenured elementary school principal with an “unblemished record for over 15 years” for failing to accurately track revenues and expenditures, and concealing deficits, while serving as a probationary Assistant Superintendent for Business. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:30 am by Stefanie Levine
”[33]  Thus, the best mode requirement does not require disclosure of a “best mode” if the inventor himself does not actually have a preference.[34]  Furthermore, the subjective test only looks at the inventor— if an inventor’s colleagues and employers may prefer another best mode and no disclosure is required. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
”[12]            So what does the evidence suggest? [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
This harmless misstatement does not rescue the relevant claims from a best mode violation. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 3:57 pm
Ultimately, the selective waiver provision[15] was not included in the final rule. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
The Committee’s observations include the following passage: Civil redress and state immunity 15. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 12:32 pm
Still others might be reluctant to kill a particular potential attacker, for instance when a woman does not want to kill an abusive ex-husband because she does not want to have to explain to her children that she killed their father, even in self-defense. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm by David Kopel
This does not mean that officers should not carry firearms. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am by Douglas E. Abrams
This article originally appeared in two parts in the Spring and Summer issues of the Missouri Bar’s quarterly magazine, Precedent. [read post]