Search for: "Edwards v. Means"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2014, 9:50 pm
Edward X. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 1:20 pm
Shortly before the Supreme Court agreed to hear a challenge to lethal injection in the Kentucky case of Baze v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
Hobbs and Miller v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:34 am
Center v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
What does that mean copyright-wise, wonders emeritus Kat Catherine Lee? [read post]
23 May 2022, 11:45 pm
When Politico published Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion that would undo Roe v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 4:54 pm
In Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Botham v Ministry of Defence [2011] UKSC 58, the Supreme Court addressed, in passing, the scenario where a dismissal is unfair “because defamatory findings were made which damage the employee’s reputation and which, following dismissal, make it difficult for the employee to find future employment”. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:30 pm
Weideman Today the California Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in Edwards v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 11:34 pm
The Court of Appeal, in Garbutt v Edwards [2005] EWCA Civ 1206, had this to say when trying to interpret the word "shall":"In particular, Rule 15 begins by providing that a solicitor ‘shall' provide costs information. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:15 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:45 am
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation and Botham v Ministry of Defence, heard 22 – 23 June 2011. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 5:43 pm
Wells Fargo in re Wachovia II: Does Plain Meaning Apply When The Plain Meaning Is Wrong? [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:46 am
In 1981, in Edwards v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 8:54 pm
Apple was originally assigned to Judge Edward M. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:30 pm
Abdo points to two concurring opinions in Jones v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 6:05 am
"] From TGP Communications, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:41 am
That's certainly true, but that doesn't mean it has to be friendly to hostile religious people. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
”11 Rothman suggests that the term “statistical significance” could be eliminated from scientific discussions without loss of meaning, and this linguistic legerdemain shows that the phrase is unimportant in science and in law.12 Rothman’s suggestion, however, ignores that causal assessments have always required an evaluation of the play of chance, especially for putative causes, which are neither necessary nor sufficient, and which modify underlying stochastic… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
Edwards, supra, 415 U.S. at pp. 808–809 [“‘While the legal arrest of a person should not destroy the privacy of his premises, it does-for at least a reasonable time and to a reasonable extent-take his own privacy out of the realm of protection from police interest in weapons, means of escape, and evidence’”] [read post]
