Search for: "Ely Lilly"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,157
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2017, 9:16 pm
The case came to the Court from ANDA litigation between Eli Lilly and Teva and other ANDA filers over infringement under 35 U.S.C.... [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
This was Andrew’s characterisation of the riddle faced by Birss J in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2016] EWHC 1955 (Pat). [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 12:41 pm
In the case of Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 12:41 pm
In the case of Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
The Federal Circuit’s decision in Akamai V broadened the circumstances in which the actions of others may be attributed to a single actor to support liability for direct infringement. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:42 pm
(Eli Lilly III), 126 F. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:11 pm
"Eli Lilly defeats Teva appeal over Alimta cancer drug": Jonathan Stempel and Bill Berkrot of Reuters have this report on a ruling that the U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 8:22 am
January, March 2018 – Two bellwether cases involving Axiron, which is manufactured by Eli Lilly and Company, will go to trial. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana – Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging patent infringement. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 11:20 am
From this December 9, 2016 Reuters article, "New diabetes guidelines imminent, Jardiance sales may surge", we get this information: Two leading U.S. medical societies are poised in the coming weeks to issue new diabetes treatment guidelines reflecting the lifesaving cardiovascular effects of Eli Lilly's Jardiance in a move expected to drive up the drug's sales. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:25 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 315 F.R.D. 191 (E.D. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 12:28 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana – Patent attorneys for Plaintiff Eli Lilly and Company filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging infringement. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
The judge held that the “undue burden” concept in English law (particularly as outlined by Arnold J in Eli Lilly v Janssen in 2014) was not particularly helpful under Australian law. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 4:53 am
The Court reminded itself of the Supreme Court’s treatment of the concept within the context of industrial applicability in HGS v Eli Lilly [2012] where it was held that “even an educated guess” as to the practical application for a claimed product can be sufficient to overcome the plausibility hurdle. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:34 pm
Eli Lilly, at least, had exhausted its recourse in Canada in this instance. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 11:33 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - Patent lawyers for Plaintiffs Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana, its subsidiary Eli Lilly Export S.A. of Geneva, Switzerland and Acrux DDS Pty Ltd of West Melbourne, Australia filed a lawsuit alleging patent infringement. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 7:49 am
The Indianapolis Business Journal reported seven men have sued drugmaker Eli Lilly, claiming the skin cancer they have suffered is related to taking Cialis to treat erectile dysfunction. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 8:48 am
” Cialis A Cash Cow for Eli Lilly Cialis was approved for sale in 2003. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:52 am
A wife complaints to the Qadi about her husband's impotence Artist: Hamse-i Atai (18th century Ottoman miniature) Source Wikipedia Mr Justice Birss: Actavis and Others v Eli Lilly and Another [2016] EWHC 1955 (Pat) (10 Aug 2016) Although it is not spelt out anywhere in the 492 paragraphs and annexes to Mr Justice Birss's judgment, this complicated [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 8:38 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. [read post]
