Search for: "Fallen v. United States"
Results 521 - 540
of 668
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2011, 9:00 am
After the order for relief, an interim trustee is appointed by the United States trustee to administer the case. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:51 pm
” United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am
Under section 31(1), a foreign judgment would be recognised and enforced in the British court if (i) the foreign court would have had jurisdiction applying sovereign immunity rules corresponding to those applicable in the United Kingdom in the 1978 Act and (ii) if it would be so recognised and enforced had it not been given against a state. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review the Tenth Circuit’s decision Golan v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:37 pm
Those who have been involved in the environmentalist side of nuclear power issues in the United States have long been arguing that existing reactor and spent fuel management could not be relied on to prevent the sort of cascade of failures now in progress at the Fukushima Daiichi plant. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:33 am
El Paso is the safest city in the United States not because their police are better than everybody else's but because of informal rules among cartels about the appropriate turf where their battles play out. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:50 pm
In 1994, as part of the Uruguay round of the GATT (it’s complicated . . . ), the US implemented Article 18 of Berne in the “Copyright Restoration Act,” restoring copyrights in foreign works that had fallen into the public domain in the United States (at least, if they had fallen into the public domain for reasons other than the expiration of their copyright term.The case has an interesting posture, which bears on what it means. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 6:50 pm
In 1994, as part of the Uruguay round of the GATT (it’s complicated . . . ), the US implemented Article 18 of Berne in the “Copyright Restoration Act,” restoring copyrights in foreign works that had fallen into the public domain in the United States (at least, if they had fallen into the public domain for reasons other than the expiration of their copyright term.The case has an interesting posture, which bears on what it means. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:25 pm
Marine--produced essentially the same lineup as last year's ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:18 am
Speech critical of the United States or the Catholic Church, as in Snyder, for example, merits the strongest and most absolute sort of protection. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am
Speaking of dead and communication.In a decision that basically all but over-ruled their decision in Crawford v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 4:15 am
First Amendment and Confrontation Clause cases always garner a lot of attention, but over the last several years, after 2005’s United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:53 am
In Barnum Timber v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:32 am
ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment This case (see yesterday’s summary) is illustrative of two misconceptions about rights that we are all in thrall to from time to time. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:41 am
I recently wrote a blog about why I did not think the United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:41 am
Dora Lane In Gordon v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 7:47 am
Cal. 2002), a case later picked up by the United States Department of Labor, which again concluded that claims adjusters should be treated as exempt. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm
Fallen, 6 S.W.3d 862, 868 (Mo.banc 1999). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:15 am
United States, 129 S. [read post]
