Search for: "Green v. White" Results 521 - 540 of 1,016
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
Grand Trunk Ry, 55 N.H. 84 (1874) (reversing traumatic cancer verdict on other grounds) New Mexico White v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:45 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> US v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
This makes Greene’s point important enough to deserve a name: How about “agonistic legitimation”? [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:38 am by WIMS
" <> Coal River Energy, LLC v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:25 am
 Last month guest Kat Darren Meale posted "Red and yellow and pink and green… or just black and white? [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:04 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Angelone, 530 U.S. 156 (2000) sloppily and needlessly paraphrased that language in a case where the state court decision was entirely reasonable and there was no need to decide whether the "extension" gloss on "unreasonable application" was proper.Today in White v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:08 am by Staci Zaretsky
* Retired Justice John Paul Stevens isn’t exactly too thrilled about the Supreme Court’s opinion in McCutcheon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
The new practice does not say that a black and white version of a mark can’t be used to successfully oppose a colour variant. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
David Byrne; White House; Al Jazeera have all used them. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:22 am by WIMS
EME Homer City[1] and Seventh, United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 19 February 2014 there will be an application in the case of White and Callaghan v Express Newspapers. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
 Accompanying said tweet was a snap of a shop frontage in familiar dark green and white livery, an iconic 'siren' logo, and the words DUMB STARBUCKS COFFEE emblazoned across the entrance.As the word spread, further details began to emerge. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:18 am by Steve Baird
 The mark is lined for the colors yellow and green. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:27 am by Joy Waltemath
Finally, the court pointed out that when the Supreme Court established the elements of a Title VII prima facie case in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, it did not include any element that depended on breaking a contract. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 5:34 pm by Pamela Wolf
The test, however, is nothing new — it’s based on the 1977 decision by 8th Circuit in Green v Missouri Pacific Railroad. [read post]