Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2023, 7:44 am
” “‘This is every law firm’s worst HIPAA nightmare, even more so for one with the well-regarded reputation like Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe,’ Hales said. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Judgment was handed down in respect of this subsequent hearing on 23 July 2014 in Coventry and others (Respondents) v Lawrence and another (Appellants) (No 2) [2014] UKSC 46. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
Hyatt, in which the Court will consider whether a state agency can be haled into another state’s courts against its will. [read post]
12 May 2011, 7:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:05 pm
Hale v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
”); Hale v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 7:10 am
" World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
In holding that “continuous and systematic contacts” alone are insufficient to establish general jurisdiction, the Supreme Court rejected the idea that a company could be haled into court merely for “doing business” in a state. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
The Court of Appeal rejected the argument of the Secretary of the State that Parliament by the 2007 Act had taken a policy decision to place the Upper Tribunal wholly beyond the reach of judicial review. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 3:13 pm
View the article here LA - Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
Consequently C had an obligation to (a) carry out a proportionality analysis of the impact of its decision on A’s and K’s Article 8 rights, and (b) consider whether taking up occupation in Ghana was in A’s son’s best interests, which were to be given primacy, following Lady Hale’s judgment in ZH v Tanzania. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
Consequently C had an obligation to (a) carry out a proportionality analysis of the impact of its decision on A’s and K’s Article 8 rights, and (b) consider whether taking up occupation in Ghana was in A’s son’s best interests, which were to be given primacy, following Lady Hale’s judgment in ZH v Tanzania. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:54 am
In Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
Hall, 440 U.S. 410 (1979), which permits a sovereign State to be haled into another State’s courts without its consent, should be overruled. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 10:24 am
” Sadly, today we report the decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 8:22 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm
Minimum wage laws are sentimental legislation with all-too-real effects [Jeffrey Dorfman] “Our Business’s Response to California $2 Minimum Wage Increase” [Coyote, with more on a union angle on minimum wage laws] Some experience from Europe [Steve Hanke, more, Cato overview of minimum wage debate] Connecticut fires state labor department employee who gamed system to get benefits for friend, then reinstates after grievance [Raising Hale] Oldie but goodie:… [read post]
Case preview: Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan and another (Respondents) (Scotland)
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
The appeal will be heard by Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
Hall, a 1979 Supreme Court ruling that said a state could be haled into another state’s courts without its consent, should be overruled. [read post]
