Search for: "HARPER v. HARPER" Results 521 - 540 of 1,647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2018, 3:25 pm by MOTP
(holding that trial court abused discretion in granting temporary injunction to secure legal remedy of damages by freezing assets unrelated to subject matter of suit); Harper v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:00 pm by Howard Knopf
   We Need to Ensure that fair dealing rights cannot be overridden by contractThe SCC has said (Royal Trust v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:57 am
A complaint or report about nepotism can be covered in some situations by the Kentucky Whistleblower Act according to the Kentucky Supreme Court's recent decision in Harper v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:52 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Gun and ammo possession Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Ronald Harper, Jr., appellant, was convicted of carrying a handgun concealed or openly about his person and possession of ammunition after having been convicted of a disqualifying crime. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm by Sheldon Gilbert
” Although few now remember Matthews’s bitter confirmation battle, he is perhaps best remembered today for his 1886 opinion in the case of Yick Wo v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 1:04 pm by maggie
Despite court decisions such as Tinker v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 8:25 am by Robert Harper
That statutory silence led courts to conclude that exoneration clauses in inter vivos trust instruments generally were enforceable, except to the extent that they sought to excuse a trustee from liability for gross negligence, reckless indifference, self-dealing, or bad faith (see Matter of Tydings, 32 Misc3d 1204[A], at *6 [Sur Ct, Bronx County 2011]; Boles v Lanham, 55 AD3d 647, 648 [2d Dep’t 2008] [opining that a “trustee is liable if he or she commits a breach of trust in… [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 7:30 pm by Sme
Foreclosure Connection, Inc. (10th Cir., August 15, 2018) (affirming award against Foreclosure Connection for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act)*Harper v. [read post]