Search for: "Hales v. Hales"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2010, 3:35 am
Despite quoting extensively from Baroness Hale’s dissenting judgment, the court ultimately rejected his claim. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 11:51 am
Rep. 514 (1920); Hale v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 2:08 am
The judgment In Gilham v Ministry of Justice [2019] UKSC 44, the Supreme Court held that a judicial office holder could pursue a complaint of protected disclosure detriment even though there was no contractual relationship [69] and Lady Hale PSC had identified at [28] four questions to be addressed: Do the facts fall within the ambit of one of the Convention rights? [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 6:33 am
Hale had a child who was murdered. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:38 am
Lady Hale gave the only substantive judgment. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:30 am
Lady Hale supported Lord Kerr’s dissenting analysis For judgment, please download: [2015] UKSC 2 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 3:52 am
Lady Hale, giving the leading judgment, stated that the respondent’s general manager should not simply have accepted the view of the inquiry that suicide was the most likely explanation for Mr Braganza’s disappearance. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:53 am
Lord Clarke gave a dissenting judgment, with which Lady Hale agreed, arguing that the costs recovery scheme was disproportionate because it did not treat all defendants in the same way and instead chose a certain class of defendants to impose liabilities beyond the bounds of what was reasonable or proportionate. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:55 am
ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, Lady Hale at para 21 quoted with approval the observation of the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR in Neulinger v Switzerland (2010) 28 BHRC 706, para 131, that “the Convention cannot be interpreted in a vacuum but must be interpreted in harmony with the general principles of international law”. [read post]
14 May 2011, 10:59 pm
Indiana Asserts Jurisdiction Over Ohio LawyerFoley v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 12:38 pm
In Price v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:06 pm
The agency, however, has reclassified FDA-Approved drugs that contain less than 0.1 percent CBD as Schedule V drugs—an apparent carve out for Epidolex. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:20 am
He commented on the court’s commitment to quality, and the fact that a number of cases heard by the UKSC over the past year have been of considerable public interest (referring in particular to R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another, Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 2012 – Reference by the Attorney General and Bank Mellat v HM Treasury). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
Judgment Their Lordships held, by a majority (Lady Hale dissenting), that the appeal should be dismissed. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
Stott) and jurisprudence from the ECtHR, and Lord Kerr and Lady Hale despite dissenting overall agreed with Lord Wilson on the status issue. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:41 am
The employment status of religious workers of all faiths has been a recurring problem in the courts: see, for example, Percy v Church of Scotland Board of National Mission [2005] UKHL 73 and Methodist Conference v Preston [2013] UKSC 29. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
" Among other heinous contributions, Hale is credited with furthering the legal rule that men cannot rape their wives and the practice of burning women at the stake when they are deemed (by men) to be witches.The citations in the draft opinion are staggering enough but, even after the world criticized Alito for including Hale in that draft, Hale still appeared in the final opinion in much the same manner. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
The view of the minority (Lady Hale, Lord Mance) The minority reasoned from a different starting point. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
CommentWhile the principles of suitability have not changed, and to that extent, there is no new law here per se, it is true that Lady Hale’s view in Birmingham CC v Ali made challenges to temporary accommodation more difficult, as the counter-argument that a property was suitable when viewed as short term accommodation would be raised. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
CommentWhile the principles of suitability have not changed, and to that extent, there is no new law here per se, it is true that Lady Hale’s view in Birmingham CC v Ali made challenges to temporary accommodation more difficult, as the counter-argument that a property was suitable when viewed as short term accommodation would be raised. [read post]
