Search for: "Holder v. United States of America" Results 521 - 540 of 619
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 8:57 am by William Carleton
These agreements create a framework for how companies should approach privacy in the United States and around the world. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO:… [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:27 am by SHG
Managing an enterprise as large, complex and powerful as the United States of America requires a significant degree of appreciation of law, governance and policy, or “how things work” if you will. [read post]
In Booking.com, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”) refused to register the mark “BOOKING.COM,” finding it generic. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:34 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
A Tax Invader is a foreigner who generates income offshore which they reveal, and on which they pay tax; specifically to the United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
Remaking the DMCA in such a way would shift almost the entire burden and cost of enforcement from copyright holders to OSPs. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
Patterson helped Warren appreciate the evils of America’s racial stratification system. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm by Schachtman
South Africa, England), this does not appear to apply for the chrysotile industry in North America. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:44 am by Kristian Soltes
As a result, indirect purchaser class actions in the United States often are not certified for class treatment under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) or comparable class action rules in state courts. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general… [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  To mark this celebration of Sandy’s 40 years at the University of Texas, I want to argue that constitutional faith provides a path back to democracy in the United States. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
There were no parallels in America as of 1776. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
  Wednesday, March 24, 2021: The Senate Foreign Relations Committee will hold a hearing on the state of democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]