Search for: "In Re: B.R.-2" Results 521 - 540 of 570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
A lawsuit between the owners of an upper east side Manhattan "gentlemen's club" called Sapphire, involving charges of self-dealing and financial abuse by the managing partner, led to an interesting but not surprising decision earlier this month, holding that a member of LLC #1 which, in turn, is a member of LLC #2, lacks standing to seek judicial dissolution of LLC #2. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
Douglas (“The report”). [2] The report identified several problems that were present in the bankruptcy code. [3] More specifically, problems that was associated with committees during the bankruptcy reorganization process. [4]The unofficial committees, the report addressed, were called “protective committees. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 7:47 pm
For these reasons, Dana, as Trustee, of either a land trust or a trust, was required to comply with section 737.403(2), when Dana gifted the Brigham Tree Farm Property to himself. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 3:01 pm
See generally, In Re Fedders North America, Inc., 405 B.R. 527, 542 (Bankr. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
[A] relative risk of 2 or greater would indicate that it was more likely than not that vaccination caused a case of GBS. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
  The defendants responded, on October 2, 2015, by “removing” the state case to the U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
This technique has, however, run into an obstacle in the Third Circuit, where a recent decision constrains a corporation’s ability to use this tactic.[2] This post will explore both these routes and the possible impact of the Purdue Pharma decision on them. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
”  [2]  The view portrayed in Professor Edelman’s statement is shared by many as the result of this case is likely to have its impact on other major sports leagues as well. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Accordingly, Section 1292(b) allows a district court to certify an issue for interlocutory appeal when: (1) the challenged ruling involves controlling questions of law, (2) there is substantial ground for difference of opinion on the ruling, and (3) an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. 28 U.S.C. [read post]