Search for: "In Re: Mark Green v." Results 521 - 540 of 658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2019, 4:07 am by SHG
Green, 399 U.S. 149, 158 (1970) (noting that cross-examination is “the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth” (internal quotation marks omitted)). [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:27 am by Charon QC
Courtesy of Mark Bennett, you can read the complaint for yourself of what is already being referred to as Rakofsky v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/AoBszeibPT -> LinkedIn’s “Reference Search” Service Doesn’t Violate Fair Credit Reporting Act–Sweet v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Charlesworth: 512 is approaching the 20-year-mark, and not merely of interest to © nerds or particular industries. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
This makes Greene’s point important enough to deserve a name: How about “agonistic legitimation”? [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the federal government in the case of United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
The holdings are quite succinct and they're well-precedented, but they� [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Joiner had can cause small-cell lung cancer.[13] Perhaps the most egregious lapses in scholarship occur when Ranges, a newly minted scientist, and her co-author, a full professor of law, write: “For example, Bendectin, an antinausea medication prescribed to pregnant women, caused a slew of birth defects (hence its nickname ‘The Second Thalidomide’).49”[14] I had to re-read this sentence many times to make sure I was not hallucinating. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
” I sent his card back to him (a bit of green re-cycling) with the message: “Dear Charon… It may surprise you, but I am familiar with Mark Twain’s aphorism. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 10:02 am
V is for VANOC, the Vancouver Olympic Organizing Committee, which persuaded the federal government to pass special legislation that grants it unique powers to guard against unauthorized use of the Olympic marks. [read post]