Search for: "In Re Court of Appeals of Wisconsin" Results 521 - 540 of 829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2014, 2:53 am by Michael DelSignore
After the Seventh Circuit affirmed the decision, the Supreme Court remanded and vacated the decision and instructed the lower court to re-examine the issue in light of Williams v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 6:19 am by Florian Mueller
Google just wanted the opportunity to re-argue claim construction in district court. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:50 am by Florian Mueller
In the Microsoft FRAND case in Seattle, its then-counsel made a concession to that effect in early 2012, but on appeal Google is probably going to re-raise this issue. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am by Marty Lederman
  (By the courts of appeals’ calculations, for example, Conestoga Wood would be liable for at least $95,000 a day; and Hobby Lobby would owe at least $1.3 million a day.) [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:34 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 996 (WI App., Nov. 27, 2013), a Wisconsin state appeals court rejected an appeal by Victoria Milewski, a Christian Scientist,whose drivers license was suspended after she refused to take a blood alcohol test. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 6:00 am by Alex Craigie
It’s ok, we’re all friends here, no? [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:44 am by Florian Mueller
Officially, that letter to the court was filed "in support of neither party", but it does support Motorola on the most basic issue on appeal: whether the court was right to dismiss Apple's request for a FRAND determination because Apple had not committed to bound by its outcome no matter what royalty rate the court might have arrived at. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 10:40 am by Kate Fort
California Court of Appeals, 4th district, 2nd division, remands for DPPS to notify the proper tribe: Here, DPSS was informed at the earliest point in the proceedings that the biological grandmother was an enrolled member of a tribe and that mother, herself, was an enrolled member of an Indian tribe. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:15 am
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit 2010). [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 2:46 am by Florian Mueller
In practical terms, if its products using Qualcomm chips (and those which used other baseband chips, such as the iPhone 4, have been discontinued) were found licensed (which involves multiple considerations including the one relevant to Apple's motion), Apple wouldn't even have to win its appeal of a dismissed Wisconsin FRAND obligations case or (in the alternative to a successful appeal) bring a new FRAND determination action to preclude Google from the pursuit of… [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm by David Kopel
The Mississippi Supreme Court took the case on interlocutory appeal, and rendered a unanimous decision on August 29, upholding House Bill 2. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 1:15 pm by Jonathan Hummel
” Largely known for manufacturing controversial red-light cameras (see story in Missouri Appeals Court). [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Examiner] Judge rules strippers at club are employees, not independent contractors as management claimed [NY Times] Judge strikes down new Indiana right-to-work law, appeal to Indiana Supreme Court expected [WXIN] Court (again) upholds Wisconsin Gov. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 2:25 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
Rosecky appealed and the court of appeals certified the question to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The district court, however, grantedDuPont’s post - trial motion for judgment as a matter oflaw that the claims of the ’723 patent are invalid under§ 112 for failure to satisfy the written description requirement.Novozymes now appeals from the district court’s finaljudgment of invalidity. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:58 am by Gene Quinn
The United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin granted summary judgment of non-infringement of U.S. [read post]