Search for: "In Re Henning"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,092
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2014, 8:38 pm
For example, in In re Fallaux, we recognized “that the unjustified patent term extension justification for obviousness-type double patenting” may have “limited force in . . . many double patenting rejections today, in no small part because of the change in the Patent Act from a patent term of seventeen years from issuance to a term of twenty years from filing. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:51 pm
Cir. 1999),“[w]hen multiple patents derive from the same initial application, the prosecution history regarding a claim limitation in any patent that has issued applies with equal force to subsequently issued patents that contain the same claim limitation. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 12:00 am
Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, Innovation Associates filed an Inter Partes Reexamination with the USPTO, and the district court stayed the proceedings pending the result of the re-exam. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 7:07 am
" Another neighbor, William Nagel, who sits on the homeowners association board, said, “Buddy, we’re here in Iowa. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:25 am
De politieagenten staakten de achtervolging toen de overvallers, nadat zij een zijweg waren ingeslagen, hen aldaar opwachtten en het vuur op hen openden. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
., §§ 15161, 15168, 15385, 15152), and relied heavily on what it found to be an analogous Supreme Court decision – In re Bay-Delta, etc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 1143 – which held that specific details about a second-tier project (the Environmental Water Account, or EWA) that were released shortly before certification of the first-tier PEIS/R for the CALFED Program need not have been included in the PEIS/R. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:23 am
S. 820/ H.R. 1731, the Egg Products Inspection Act Amendments, to improve the lives of hundreds of millions of egg-laying hens and give consumers more information on egg carton labels. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:37 am
A Town Justice ran for re-election. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:59 am
Oh, they’re still out there. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 1:27 pm
If we get lazy about our historical facts, we risk accepting at face value the interpretations of those facts we’re being fed. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:08 am
In In Re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation, No. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:21 am
We may be faced with an evolving re-definition of that law school chestnut: Who is the client? [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:43 am
’In re Warrant, supra. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
Henning, 212 W.Va. 128, 569 S.E.2d 204 (2002). [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
” Harris, 753 S.E.2d at 279 (citing and quoting from In re Flood Litig. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm
McCusker, a case in Birmingham County Court, used Superstrike to come to the same conclusion, emphasising the point that prescribed information also needs to be re-served. [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:00 am
The last opinion available on Lexis or Westlaw for Seavey v. [read post]
1 May 2014, 1:01 pm
According to Defendants, Plotke and Alejo re-entered the interview room, and Alejo observed a microphone symbol with wave bars on the screen of Moore’s Blackberry phone. [read post]
1 May 2014, 12:20 pm
[s]o you’re asking us to decide a question . . . that is of no value? [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:45 am
You’re fired. [read post]
