Search for: "In re J. W." Results 521 - 540 of 1,977
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
It is my great pleasure to pass along the announcement of the publication of Joel Slawotsky's excellent article: "The National Security Exception in US-China FDI and Trade: Lessons from Delaware Corporate Law" which appears in the The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 6(2):228–264.In this new era defined by the re-creation of global regional economic blocks--one centered in China, and the other in the United States, the issue of national interest in the areas where the… [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 2:08 am by Jessica Kroeze
Insbesondere im zweiten Fall wäre bis zur Herausbildung einer einheitlichen Handhabung der verschiedenen Kammern von gravierender Rechtsunsicherheit auszugehen und es stellten sich nicht unerhebliche organisatorische Probleme. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
In In re Marriage of Suggs, the Washington Supreme Court set aside a civil harassment restraining order that barred "knowingly and willfully making invalid and unsubstantiated allegations or complaints to third parties which are designed for the purpose of annoying, harassing, vexing, or otherwise harming [plaintiff] and for no lawful purpose. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 3:00 am by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Eine Regelung zur Einbindung der Access Provider zur Bekämpfung von Urheberrechtsverletzungen im Internet mit geeigneten Verfahren und technischen Sperrmassnahmen wäre durch den Gesetzgeber zu treffen. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:19 am by MBettman
I am re-posting Attorney Bill Gallagher’s guest post on bail reform to include some additional information from him. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 11:10 am by MBettman
Staying in jail unable to avoid the financial burden of the conditions or taking on unsustainable debt, which can interfere with successful re-entry following completion of the criminal case. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:35 am by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Auch wenn eine Anspielung der angefochtenen Marke an die Widerspruchsmarke 1 [von Apple mit dem angebissenen Apfel], deren Bekanntheit zufolge, erkennbar bliebe, würde sie keine Verwechslungsgefahr bewirken, sondern wäre dies in einem Zivil- oder Strafverfahren unter Art. 15 MSchG oder Art. 3 Bst. e UWG zu prüfen (vgl. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
§115(d)(3)(J)(i)(I)]  The license availability date is January 1, 2021, so the date specified to begin distributions is “on or after” January 1, 2023. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 12:00 am by Rick Klau
Which is good, because any amount of interaction w/the screen while driving would likely drive me batty. [read post]