Search for: "In re Jack C."
Results 521 - 540
of 606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2010, 7:55 am
” FSIS drastically shifted how it interpreted and enforced the FMIA in 1994 when, following the Jack in the Box outbreak, the agency declared E. coli O157:H7 to be an adulterant. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 1:09 am
Andreas Spickhoff on the ECJ’s decision in C-278/09 (Olivier Martinez, Robert Martinez ./. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:10 pm
Leo a Samurai Jack. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:55 am
And, once I sat up until 3:00 AM watching congress debate whether English should be our “national language” on C-Span. [read post]
26 May 2013, 8:58 am
Food producers go about their business, and if they do everything right, they’re fine. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
Legal Transformations and the Making of Gendered Sovereignty—Jack Jin Gary Lee, Oberlin College· Secularizing Islam: The Colonial Encounter and the Making of a British Islamic Law in Northern Nigeria—Rabiat Akande, Harvard Law School· The Lawless Europeans: Law and Order on Penang island, 1786-1807—Hanisah Binte Abdullah Sani, University of… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 2:53 pm
“And if you’re saying that I can be bought for $5,000, I’m offended. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
The re-publication of information gathered from an authorised news publication will also be an authorised news publication. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
I agree with Professor Kyle C. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
The rules will affect groups organized under 501(c)(4) of the tax code. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
In 2015, as part of a tribute to the late Judge Jack Weinstein, Professor Faigman offered the remarkable suggestion that in advancing differential etiologies, expert witnesses were inventing wholesale an approach that had no foundation or acceptance in their scientific disciplines: “Differential etiology is ostensibly a scientific methodology, but one not developed by, or even recognized by, physicians or scientists. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
., Jack Michael Beermann, Major Questions, Delegation, Chevron and the Anti-Innovation Supreme Court at 8 (March 9, 2023) (“This article also illustrates how the Court is doing a poor job providing clear instructions to lower courts and other government entities on how and in some cases even whether to apply its doctrines. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
In You're My Huckleberry, I'm Your Jim, BLB post author C. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:35 am
Re-showing all the scenes and evidence while Costner is explaining it. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm
See In re The First Marblehead Corp. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
” Jack B. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Edward K. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 9:19 pm
Skelly's first post on A&C was July 4, 2004: Mission Statement. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
Smith, 494 U.S. 872, 883–85 (1990), and re-establish the “balancing” test established by Sherbert v. [read post]
