Search for: "In re Joseph B" Results 521 - 540 of 734
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 5:51 am by Larry Ribstein
The WSJ editorial also calls attention to the fundamental misdirection of blame at the heart of the AIG prosecutions: The collapse of this case renders even more appalling the way that prosecutors used it to force both companies to fire their CEOs—Joseph Brandon at Gen Re and Hank Greenberg at AIG. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:18 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Physicians who pass the examination, referred to as B-Readers, visually analyze opacities and record their findings and interpretations on standard International Labor Organization, “ILO” forms. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm by Mandelman
  For example, in the case of In re: Lopez, No. 09-10346, 2011 WL 576820 (Bankr. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
” In re Tyrone Noling, 2011 U.S. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:34 pm by Jack D
Le bureau de l’association française des juges de l’asile est constitué de MM Anicet Le Pors, président, Pierre Bégault, Cyril Brami, Philippe Callen, Annie-France Cartal, Claude Dehouck, Laure Ginesti, Claude Jorda, Joseph Krulic, Smaïn Laacher, Christophe Laurent, Marie-Sophie Peyre et Paul Poudade. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:00 am by SHG
We’re right across the street from the New York Stock Exchange. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am by Law Lady
The high court said the trial judge correctly ruled that conservator Joseph Shevlin did not breach his duty to protect the assets of the elderly man, identified in the court's opinion as "J.R. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
§§ 3584(a), 3585(b), and 3621(b), the Bureau of Prisons must administer the sentence of a federal prisoner in a manner that effectuates the subsequent judgment of the state judiciary that the state sentence run concurrently with the previously imposed federal term of imprisonment? [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:05 pm
If you practice law, go to law school, or just know that lawyers exist, I trust by now you've read the story of Joseph Rakofsky's representation in a murder case.New details have surfaced.He solicited himself for the case. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
It might be thought that this does little more than re-emphasise what is already apparent from the existing rules relating to jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:42 pm by David Kravets
“They’re holding themselves out as the owner of a title they don’t own,” Pia said. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:16 am by Steven G. Pearl
***ARGUMENT OF JOSEPH SELLERS, REPRESENTING DUKES: JUSTICE KENNEDY: It's not clear to me: What is the unlawful policy that Wal-Mart has adopted, under your theory of the case? [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:09 am by INFORRM
  This re-definition of the defence means that the virtues (such as they are) and vices (which are well known) of the Reynolds defence remain intact – it remains complex and costly, focusing on the quality of journalism rather than on truth. [read post]