Search for: "In re W. J. L." Results 521 - 540 of 858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Take Payday Lenders and Arbitration as a Textbook Case: What is the Majority Position on Litigation Waiver and Who Got It Right? [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
Revisiting the Constitutionality of Independent Agencies July 21, 2020 |Bernard W. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
See In re T.R. (1990), 52 Ohio St.3d 6, 16 n.9 (adult civil and criminal proceedings are "presumptively open to the public"); State ex rel. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Many were in favor of owners: Petrella, Nat’l Cable TV Ass’n v. [read post]
But the numerous research studies related to COVID-19 and the need to be ready for eventual health crisis of this type in the future invite us to try to (re)examine the question rationally: what is the real nature of the compulsory license? [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 11:13 pm
J. of Invalidity 14. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]