Search for: "J. P. v. S. S. and C. S." Results 521 - 540 of 3,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2008, 5:30 pm
Next, the majority concludes that, under our Supreme Court's opinion in Oviatt v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:02 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Thus, the design cannot be itself a useful article (p. 7).This interpretation is consistent with Mazer v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 12:48 pm by Giles Peaker
The Admin Court held: Via R. v Camden LBC Ex p. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Est-ce suffisant pour lui permettre de côtoyer son père ? [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
Never too late 32 [week ending Sunday 8 February] –- Brazilian PTO’s delays | The Research Handbook on International Intellectual Property reviewed | Laura Smith-Hewitt | IP, women and leadership: the poll responses | Decline of West’s trust in innovation | Wikipedia public domain photos |CJEU in Case C-383/12 P Environmental Manufacturing LLP v OHIM | The Nordic IP Forum | The future of EPO’s BoA | Warner-Lambert… [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:08 pm
A Segunda Turma do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) concedeu Habeas Corpus (HC 111442) impetrado pela Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) em favor de A.F.S. e determinou que seja excluída da sentença de pronúncia (decisão que submeteu o acusado ao julgamento pelo Tribunal do Júri) a qualificadora da surpresa, que impossibilita a defesa da vítima, prevista no inciso IV do parágrafo 2º do artigo 121 do… [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:13 am
Park, Judge.Representing Appellant Hull: Frank J. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal (Dame Victoria Sharp P, Sir Geoffrey Vos C and Davis LJ) unanimously allowed Mr Lloyd’s appeal (with the Chancellor giving the only substantive judgment), granting him permission to serve out. [read post]