Search for: "J.A. v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2021, 4:01 am
Dingwall, 2020 BCCA 108; 2021 SCC 35 (39274) Rowe J.: “We would dismiss the appeal substantially for the reasons of Newbury J.A., at paras. 51 and 53. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:13 am
In Tinnus v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:34 am
S.C.) at 316, per Middleton J.A. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:40 pm
” (J.A., vol. 4, at 913-14.) [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:10 pm
" J.A. 66, para. 129. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:36 am
– Austin 1988); J.A. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 10:09 pm
" J.A. 252. [read post]
26 May 2019, 4:01 am
Kirk v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:37 pm
Joint Appendix ("J.A. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
” Kasirer J.: “I would dismiss the appeal … In sum, in respect of both the mental health and the after-the-fact evidence, I see no reviewable errors in the jury charge and, on these points, I would adopt the majority reasons of van Rensburg J.A. as my own, without reserve. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:31 pm
J.A. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm
A defence of explanation, as stated in Hackman v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:20 am
As Brenda Crossman wrote earlier this week in the Globe and Mail, the Supreme Court of Canada in R v J.A, clarified the law of consent by declaring consensual sexual activity to be an on-going process from which consent can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:33 am
R. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:49 am
State v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 11:22 am
Id. at 1194; cf. plaintiff's actual closing argument, quoted here (see J.A. 211-12). [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:40 pm
See J.A. at 86-87. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 12:32 pm
J.A. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
” J.A. 119-20. [read post]
