Search for: "Jennings v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 782
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2016, 12:39 pm
In response to president-elect Donald Trump’s hostility toward NATO over the campaign season, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg penned an op-ed on Sunday arguing that “going it alone is not an option, either for Europe or for the United States. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 12:42 pm
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon Straus summarized the latest developments in Trump V. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am
Vera Miranova provided her interviews with foreign Islamic State women about accountability and punishments for Islamic State activities. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:30 am
This is the court, remember, that directly and deliberately defied the United States Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court in 1986 in Meritor v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
I would like to thank David and Jen for their willingness to publish their article on this site. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 7:01 am
Meanwhile, Brenna Gautam and Julia Solomon-Strauss provided us with a detailed breakdown of last week’s military commissions hearings in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 1:05 pm
"We have never required the General Assembly to recite talismanic phrases or magic words when expressing its intent for a statute to be applied retroactively," O'Donnell wrote.The lawsuit, Hyle v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
Since then she’s been refused certain spousal benefits and is required to pay inheritance taxes on Underwood’s estate; issues which, ironically, are nearly identical to those raised by Edith Winsor in the seminal same-sex marriage case, United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
” Emphasizing the dispute over state-federal relations in Arizona v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 1:21 pm
Jennings, 209 N.C. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
Moreover, according to the defendant's own submissions by reference to Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, it is a principle which enables the court to modify the parties' substantive rights in order to achieve what it regards as a just solution in the particular case I conclude, therefore, that the defendant cannot rely on principles of estoppel to avoid liability in this case. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:18 am
While each of the EU states is left to its own devices in ensuring that a proper decorum is maintained between Articles 8 and 10, should a state fail to reach an appropriate balance it can be brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) for a spot of marriage guidance. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
Anderson talk about the case of Trump v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm
Martin Carl Jennings, 2010 Cal. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:30 pm
Circuit’s ruling in Doe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Jennings (2022). [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 3:27 pm
Last July, in Missouri v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:58 am
United States. [read post]
11 May 2022, 12:52 pm
The bill—introduced in the wake of a leaked Supreme Court draft decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
