Search for: "Johnson v. State of California" Results 521 - 540 of 1,507
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:12 am by Jon Sands
California does not apply and neither does the 9th Cir’s decision in US v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Hoping to blame Pacific Gas & Electric power lines for Northern California fires, lawyers from coast to coast descend on wine country [Paul Payne, Santa Rosa Press-Democrat] Courts should police lawyers’ handling of class actions, including temptation to sweep additional members with doubtful claims into class so as to boost fees [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Reilly Stephens on Cato certiorari amicus in case of Yang v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 12:17 pm by Lisa Ouellette
And judges will have opportunities since the issue is percolating through the courts in other cases, such as California v. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 10:49 am by John Elwood
California Coastal Commission. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am by Marty Lederman
”  Thus, as the Solicitor General explainedto the Supreme Court in the recent United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:59 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that the employer engaged in ex parte communications that discouraged drivers from participating in the lawsuit, and provided drivers with a misleading and inaccurate release, the court concluded that the releases signed by the employees were invalid (Johnson v. [read post]