Search for: "LIVINGSTON v LIVINGSTON" Results 521 - 540 of 869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2012, 9:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Here's an interesting Federal Employers' Liability Act case that shows that the trial judge has authority to order a new trial if the jury does not award the injured plaintiff enough money.The case is Anderson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:34 am by Alan Ackerman
  Freep.com When asked whether workers intended to return to complete the work, Martucci noted that attorneys for the Henses were seeking an injunction in Livingston County Circuit Court to stop the work. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 9:34 am by Steve Statsinger
August 8, 2012) (Livingston, Lynch, Droney, CJJ) (per curiam), adopts the Supreme Court’s decision in Dorsey v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  (In the afternoon I make Pierson v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:34 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court ruled in 2007 in another Texas death penalty case, Panetti v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
Statements in Open Court and Apologies On 18 July 2012 there was a Statement in Open Court [pdf] in the case of Gilligan v Faber & Faber, arising out of comments made in Ken Livingstone’s auto-biography. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Andrew Gilligan, former Evening Standard reporter and now the London editor of the Daily and Sunday Telegraph, had been accused by Ken Livingstone of making false statements in the Evening Standard about Livingstone’s time at City Hall. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:42 pm by INFORRM
Mr Justice Tugendhat set out the well known principles governing the determination of meaning – set out conveniently in the recent case of Modi v Clarke ([2011] EWCA Civ 937 paras 10 to 12). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:10 am by Steve Hall
The Supreme Court established standards to assess whether severely mentally ill inmates are competent to be executed in a 1986 case, Ford v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:04 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But it remands the case for a new trial on damages because the jury improperly awarded them compensatory damages on the basis of time-barred acts.The case is Chin v. [read post]