Search for: "Lilly v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2011, 12:06 pm
The IBJ quoted a Lilly statement as stating "Human Genome Sciences seek to foreclose a whole area of research in a way that is not only harmful to the industry, but would ultimately and unjustifiably hinder the future development of new medicines. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:42 am
Supreme Court Rainy Sky SA & Orsd v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 (2 November 2011) Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 (2 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Smith & Anor v Jafton Properties Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1251 (02 November 2011) Shiva Ltd v Transport for London [2011] EWCA Civ 1189 (02 November 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Business Dream Ltd, Re Insolvency Act 1986 [2011] EWHC 2860 (Ch)… [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:57 pm
Still, you can’t blame the inventor for trying… The dispute in Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly is, by comparison, a whole other kettle of fish. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:40 am
Supreme Court Rainy Sky SA & Orsd v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50 (2 November 2011) Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 (2 November 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MD (Angola) & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1238 (01 November 2011) Mitu v London Borough of Camden [2011] EWCA civ 1249 (01 November 2011) Williams v University… [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 4:53 am
The Kat had this brilliant idea for what you get when you cross 'Neutrokine-a' with 'genome' Hot off the press and not yet digested, this morning's ruling of the United Kingdom's Supreme Court in Human Genome Sciences Inc. v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51, will be the subject of considerable analysis in the coming days and weeks. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:24 am
Art 57 states that an invention is susceptible of industrial application if it can be made or used in any kind of industry. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am
A. v Kookmin Bank, heard 27 July 2011, and Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly and Company, heard 18 – 21 July 2011. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 2009 WL 5216930, at *12 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:24 am
Eli Lilly paid $1.4 billion for Zyprexa marketing. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:36 am
[2] Markman v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:25 am
In 1947, the Supreme Court, in Lillie v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Newsru LTD (The IP Factor) Netherlands Major Usenet provider ordered to remove all infringing content (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom Expedited trials in English patent actions – HTC v Apple (judgment of Arnold J on 19th September 2011) (Kluwer Patent Blog) Newzbin2 team up with The Pirate Bay to defeat site blocking (TorrentFreak) EWHC (Pat): Halliburton gets simulation patent after all: Halliburton Energy Services v Comptroller-General of Patents (IPKat) (EPLAW)… [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 4:37 pm
” United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 8:43 am
" Datatern, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:21 am
Street v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:07 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 589 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:29 pm
In Ledbetter v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:27 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:56 pm
For instance, in Eli Lilly v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 7:55 pm
Eli Lilly v. [read post]
