Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 521 - 540 of 39,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2019, 7:12 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Maybe this is nothing, but this is a little bit WEIRD . . . in that the Ninth Circuit’s opinions webpage links to an order granting rehearing (here) but there was no response brief docketed AND there is nothing on the court’s docket sheet indicating the petition was granted. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 11:01 am by maanee763
The landmark case resulting from such a fight, GTB v Director, MDNR, et al, was upheld on appeal in 1998, and proved to be a great victory for Indian treaty rights. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 6:52 am
The Metropolitan News-Enterprise reports on a charming little case called Shalant v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:09 am
It may be a little while before we see what the U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2006, 3:20 pm
It's the time of year when many of us head up to the Sierras for a little skiing and snowboarding, so it seems appropriate to highlight a recent California appellate opinion, Lackner v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:09 pm
A little noticed, but important consitutional law decision, is Karpova v. [read post]
30 Jan 2006, 3:20 pm
It's the time of year when many of us head up to the Sierras for a little skiing and snowboarding, so it seems appropriate to highlight a recent California appellate opinion, Lackner v. [read post]
30 Jan 2006, 3:20 pm
It's the time of year when many of us head up to the Sierras for a little skiing and snowboarding, so it seems appropriate to highlight a recent California appellate opinion, Lackner v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 12:05 am by John Steele
Ryan will make little difference in either the enforcement of the right to the effective assistance of counsel... [read post]
30 Jan 2006, 11:20 pm
It's the time of year when many of us head up to the Sierras for a little skiing and snowboarding, so it seems appropriate to highlight a recent California appellate opinion, Lackner v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:21 am by tortsprof
Google, there is little consensus as to the scope of Section... [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 4:54 am by sally
“The Jones v Kernott judgment does little to resolve the grey area of ex-cohabitees’ entitlements to a share in their former home.” Full story The Guardian, 10th November 2011 Source: www.guardian.co.uk [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 5:49 pm by constitutional lawblogger
No, not John Paul Cohen's jacket about the draft, central to the 1971 case of Cohen v. [read post]