Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States" Results 521 - 540 of 3,660
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
The court stated that claim construction implies construing the use of drafting techniques (Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by Jed Rubenfeld
Given the current climate, hate speech prosecutions will probably become more common in the United States soon. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 1:53 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Foreign businesses with principal places of business outside the United States may never be subject to general jurisdiction in this country even though they have continuous and systematic contacts within the United States. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 11:58 am by Stephen Pitel
  The application of the commercial activity exception to the facts is somewhat brief (para. 35), though there is some useful discussion of the scope of the exception in the United Kingdom, the United States and Canada (paras. 25-33). [read post]
18 May 2021, 2:22 pm by Josh Blackman
The upshot of this decision is that litigants can keep cases out of state court for a very long time. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
This may not be as well-known to those who live out on the coasts, but the United States is currently suffering through a drought as bad as any we’ve seen in some time—United States Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack recently said it was “the most serious situation we’ve had in probably 25 years. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:47 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
If you don't have a venue statute likeSection 1400, you get the kind of litigation experiencesthat are set out in the amici briefs.The -- the law professor's brief noted thatthere's a single judge in the United States that hasone-quarter of all patent cases in the United States onhis docket. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:01 pm
The private-public distinction, however, is not significant as long as the party is a state actor for the purpose of due process, and this Court has unequivocally stated that Amtrak is a state actor for this purpose. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:16 am by Mailee Smith
Smith, Staff Counsel at Americans United for Life (Counsel of Record for Drury Development Corporation et al. in Sebelius v. [read post]