Search for: "Lowe v. Department of Corrections"
Results 521 - 540
of 614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
Below you will find the Pennsylvania UCP affiliates: UCP of Pennsylvania 1902 Market Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 761-6129; (866) 761-6129 (Toll Free) Fax: (717) 761-2534 E-mail: info@ucpofpa.org Web: http://www.ucpofpa.org UCP Central PA 44 South 38th Street Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717) 975-0611 Fax: (717) 975-0839 E-mail: kidscenter@ucpcentralpa.org Web: http://www.ucpcentralpa.org Administrative Office/Alternatives West 925 Linda Lane Camp Hill, PA 17011 Phone: (717)… [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
As we shift retail-oriented rulemaking, examination, and enforcement resources toward protecting investors in private funds, we subtly depart from the statutory model. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:32 am
Verdict: wrong. (9) As a result of the jury's guilty verdict in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
The committee will hear testimony from Christopher Maier, acting assistant defense secretary for special operations and low-intensity conflict; Gen. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 7:56 am
It filed a complaint against the director of the state department of corrections seeking a declaration that state law prohibiting disclosure of certain execution protocol information violates the First Amendment. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
As we write this, 43 percent of Americans approve of the president’s performance so far—an unusually low figure for a new president but nevertheless a significant portion of the country. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 10:19 am
Civil False Claims Act Cases Brought Against Hospice Agencies: Overall, settlements and judgments under the Federal civil False Claims Act [2] are anticipated to be at historic lows when comparing Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 to previous years. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 7:32 am
The GDPR’s new, low bar for protection of free expression on the Internet will shape future cases before DPAs and courts, and will likely also affect legislation in other areas. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
The GDPR’s new, low bar for protection of free expression on the Internet will shape future cases before DPAs and courts, and will likely also affect legislation in other areas. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm
The EPA and health department had sued the companies, claiming the slag-dumping process at the mill violates the federal Clean Air Act. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm
The Department of Public Safety had asked for significantly more money for its crime labs than in the previous biennium because they don't control their own budget. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 5:16 am
Embedded training involves sending fake phishing emails, seeing how employees do, and then sending corrective explanatory information afterward. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm
Up to $8000 per work—the statute says up to $150,000, but a jury has awarded that in Capitol Records v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:29 pm
The Supreme Court recognized this connection in General Electric v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
” (For instance, if a person were due $150,000 in December 2013 and did not receive the money until April 2015, she would have lost, even in the current low-inflation, low-interest-rate environment, something more than $2,000.) [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
We note further that the clause 1(4) listing also does not include the idea that the defendant’s post-publication behaviour should be responsible if the defence is to apply (for example, by correcting any identified error of fact). [read post]
