Search for: "MALEE v DISTRICT COURT" Results 521 - 540 of 2,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2015, 7:08 am by Joy Waltemath
“Title VII is not a ‘get out of work free’ card for parents with young children—whether male or female,” explained a federal district court in Wisconsin in granting summary judgment against the sex discrimination claim of an employee fired after missing work to take her children to the dentist. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 2:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia (Civil Action No.1:23-cv-1500), seeking an array of monetary damages (including back pay), and injunctive relief enjoining such discrimination in the future.In a written statement, EEOC Philadelphia Regional Attorney Debra M. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:00 am
Yet, weeks later, the company posted an announcement on social media that it had promoted a less experienced male employee to the slot.Since such conduct violated Title VII, which prohibits sex discrimination, the EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Eastern Division (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Western District of Michigan, seeking monetary damages for the impacted employee’s “emotional distress,” together with an award of punitive damages.In a written statement, an EEOC Senior Trial Attorney, Dale Price, noted, “An employer cannot condone a work environment where a female employee is degraded and threatened because of her sex or wait until it is presented with a protection order before it decides to act …. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
District Court of Arizona, seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In a written statement, EEOC Phoenix District Office Regional Attorney, Mary Jo O’Neill, observed, “Sexual harassment is unacceptable and unfortunately continues to be prevalent in the workplace …. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:28 am by Andrew Koppelman
As a recent district court decision striking down a similar Missouri law explains, “[t]he State’s ‘permission to marry’ depends on the gender of the would-be participants. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:08 am by Joel R. Brandes
After learning the location of his wife and children, Ontiveros pursued in district court a petition for return of an abducted child (A.O.L.) under the Hague Convention. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 8:01 am by Joy Waltemath
The court also referenced the Seventh Circuit’s July 2016 decision in Hively v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 11:22 am by Emily Beeken
The suit was filed on Thursday in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts and is seeking to have the Court set aside the rule as arbitrary and capricious, contrary to existing law, and in violation of the US Constitution. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:47 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana2013) (“LaRocca v. [read post]