Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 521 - 540
of 20,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2011, 2:08 pm
Applying Rule 23(b)(3) in difficult cases arguably requires two lines of inquiry. [read post]
12 May 2017, 12:56 am
Since 2003, more than twenty decisions reaching this conclusion have been issued, the most recent so far (of which the board is aware) being T 1948/10, T 608/12, T 2331/11 and T 1507/10.It may, therefore, be said that today there is agreement or at least a clearly predominant opinion among the boards that the definition of the "forbidden area" of a claim should not be considered as a matter related to Article 83 EPC. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:45 am
The manager generally used foul language, which isn’t good, but it isn’t illegal either. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 7:37 am
As a practical matter, they need to either (a) get the decision reversed, (b) rewrite the regulations, or (c) accept really bad results as par for the course. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:23 pm
This is true both in law schools and in B schools. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Robert B. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:15 am
" Genetic Veterinary Sciences, Inc. d/b/a Paw Prints Genetics v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:53 am
D&M Holdings Inc. d/b/a The D+M Group et al, 1-14-cv-01330 (DED September 9, 2015, Order) (Andrews, J.) [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:09 am
” Brian T. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
The present claim is comparable to the device claims of the auxiliary request in decision T 775/97 [3.1] which were found not to fall under the exclusion clause of A 52(4) EPC 1973.The reasoning of T 82/93 [1.5-5] is not applicable to the present situation either. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 2:52 pm
How will that apply to claims for internet access, smart devices, tech services, and other products and services that didn’t exist when the cases were brought? [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 7:47 pm
It doesn't matter if you have used a CPAP for sleep apnea for years. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:00 am
As neither the appellant nor respondent 1 had presented said matter in their submissions according to Article 12(1) and (2) RPBA, it was not within the scope of the present appeal. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
What is “only by A or by B” supposed to mean? [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
Elsewhere it won’t be changing either because the Member State isn’t interested or it can’t legally change. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 1:27 pm
” On the surface, the “Five B’s” might seem wholly unrelated to technology, but that couldn’t be further from reality. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 8:04 am
At the time I didn't understand how Bank of America could apparently repeal the laws of supply and demand when no one else could. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 6:39 am
No difference b/t LI & Twitter to me. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 7:56 pm
Richard B. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 7:56 pm
Richard B. [read post]
