Search for: "MATTER OF F B"
Results 521 - 540
of 9,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2007, 10:56 am
Curtin, __ F.3d __, 2007 WL 1500295 (9th Cir. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 10:03 am
§ 11607(b)(3); Ozaltin v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 5:28 am
Panache Broadcasting of Pennsylvania, Inc., 202 F.3d 957, 959 (7th Cir. 2000) [holding that “when a class-certification order is an arguable candidate for a Rule 23(f) appeal, the appellants may not use section 1292(b) to circumvent the 10-day limitation in Rule 23(f)”]). [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:51 am
§112(f). [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
First of all it was not appropriate to start from example F as closest prior art, which exhibited unfavourable properties,. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:07 pm
§ 102(b). [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
As a general matter, the text of a guideline trumps commentary about it. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 8:48 am
Inc., 825 F.3d 1360, 1366 (Fed. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:12 am
ITC, 909 F.3d 1110, 128 USPQ2d 1538, 1546 (Fed. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:28 pm
These sections are relied on relatively infrequently by alleged infringers because in most cases, a prior invention is disclosed in a publication or through public use and is asserted under Sections 102(a) or (b).Sufficient Evidence of Prior Conception: Plaintiff argued that it was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Defendants' 102(f) and 102(g) claims. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:11 pm
Thomas F. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:00 am
§ 1332(d)(5)(B). [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 12:11 pm
Information that is submitted will become part of the public record of the meeting.Electronic submissions:Use the SEC's Internet submission form or send an e-mail to rule-comments@sec.gov.Paper submissions:Send paper submissions to Brent Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549-1090.All submissions should refer to File Number 265-27, and the file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:40 am
Please contact Arthur F. [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:54 am
It submitted auxiliary requests A' to F', A008a, A009 and A009a.XI. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:12 am
P. 60(b)(2) and (b)(3). [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The appointing authority was authorized to impose an initial probationary period of no more than 52 weeks, citing 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][2]).2. 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][5][ii] provides that "[i]f the conduct or performance of a probationer is not satisfactory, his or her employment may be terminated at any time after eight weeks and before completion of the maximum period of service" but the he appointing officer may, as a matter of discretion, offer the probationer an… [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The appointing authority was authorized to impose an initial probationary period of no more than 52 weeks, citing 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][2]).2. 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][5][ii] provides that "[i]f the conduct or performance of a probationer is not satisfactory, his or her employment may be terminated at any time after eight weeks and before completion of the maximum period of service" but the he appointing officer may, as a matter of discretion, offer the probationer an… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
The appointing authority was authorized to impose an initial probationary period of no more than 52 weeks, citing 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][2]).2. 4 NYCRR 4.5[b][5][ii] provides that "[i]f the conduct or performance of a probationer is not satisfactory, his or her employment may be terminated at any time after eight weeks and before completion of the maximum period of service" but the he appointing officer may, as a matter of discretion, offer the probationer an… [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 12:53 pm
B. 8 has been to nullify this Court’s rulings. [read post]
