Search for: "Mark Cover" Results 521 - 540 of 18,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am by Eric Goldman
Although the customer may experience initial customer interest when clicking on Peninsula’s Google ad with Penn Engineering’s marks, that user cannot experience yet another instance of initial interest once directed to Peninsula’s website I have a better idea: perhaps the entire concept of initial interest confusion is illusory, so it occurs never; not once, twice, or more times in the same search. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 6:50 am
Andrusiek submitted evidence of such technical trademark use from 2016 and 2017, including displays of comic book covers on Amazon, on YouTube, and in other media. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:50 am by Brian Finucane
Following Hamas’ attack on October 7th, the U.S. government acted swiftly to dissuade other regional actors such as Hizballah or Iran from intervening in the latest round of Israeli-Hamas hostilities. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:31 am by Beatrice Yahia
The Swiss attorney general’s office said the indictment against Sonko covers alleged crimes during the 16-year rule of then-President Yahya Jammeh, which was marked by sexual abuse, extrajudicial killings, and arbitrary detention. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Eric B. Meyer
Marine Corps, and his reporting while he was in the Middle East,’ including embedding with Syrian opposition fighters and covering ISIS in Iraq. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 5:00 pm by Harbir Deol
Succession and Contingency Planning (Principle 8) The 2023 Code reiterates the importance of succession and contingency planning, extending Principle 8 to cover contingency planning for the absence of key members of staff. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 3:19 pm by Ilya Somin
But January 6 was an insurrection even under a narrow definition that covers only violent attempts to illegally seize control of the powers of government. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 4:16 am by Nedim Malovic
The EUTM proprietor did not provide arguments explaining why it re-filed an identical mark for goods and services which were identical to some of the goods and services already covered by its earlier registration.Taking into account all the factual circumstances, the Cancellation Division concluded that the filing of the application of the contested EUTM, insofar as it included the goods and services already covered by an earlier EUTM registration, was made without any… [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
“Though use of a mark by licensees supports its strength, the use of Plaintiff’s hybrid marks throughout Florida’s 67 counties to cover services that are actually provided by both Plaintiff and Defendants weakens Plaintiff’s marks significantly. [read post]
First, the new lawyer-prosecutors, structurally more independent, impartial, and supposedly experienced, should be handling the disposition of all criminal allegations, not just for a little over a dozen “covered” offenses. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:09 am by SHG
Make sure the pull tab covering the creamer is facing the palm of your hand. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:33 am
As to the goods not covered by the prior registration, the Board found confusion unlikely but dilution-by-blurring likely. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 9:42 am by Dennis Crouch
However, the court held those cases require adequate “blaze marks” guiding a skilled artisan to visualize the genus, which were lacking here. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 3:58 am by Adams Lee
Scope The proposed scope definition of this case is as follows: The merchandise covered by the investigations is certain narrow neck glass bottles, with a nominal capacity of 750 milliliters (25.36 ounces), consistent with the authorized standards of fill in 27 C.F.R. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:08 am
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion: Precedential No. 34: TTAB Dismisses Monster Energy's Section 2(d) Claim On Summary Judgment Due to DIssimilarity of Design Marks Precedential No. 29: After an Exhausting 2(d) Analysis, TTAB Finds HME (Stylized) Confusable with KME for Building Products Precedential No. 27: TTAB Renders Split Decision in Appeal From Section 2(d) Refusal of IMPACT for Various Healthcare Services Precedential No. 12: TTAB Hands Win to MLBPA and Aaron… [read post]