Search for: "Matter of Crawford"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,018
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Crawford, 306 N.W.2d 614, 623 (N.D. 1981) (dictum); Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 5:54 pm
New Mexico and the recent line of cases dating to Crawford v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
But how close is a matter of balancing. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:07 am
A principal virtue of Crawford is that it recognizes that the confrontation right, just like the right to counsel and the right to jury, is a basic procedural right that we adhere to as a uniform matter; we do not decide case by case whether it is worthwhile in the particular circumstances. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:57 am
For now, we can say that Crawford took a giant step in the right direction. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:41 am
Scalia rejected this logic in Crawford, holding that it didn’t matter whether the evidence was reliable; the Framers required confrontation (for testimonial statements), at least, so confrontation it had to be. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:52 pm
Third, bear in mind an important point made by Crawford: Although various doctrines in the 18th century allowed certain types of what we would now characterize as hearsay, there was not a reliability-based set of exceptions for testimonial statements; the dying declaration exception (which I think should be justified on other grounds) was, as Crawford said, sui generis. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
The defendant would not be able to confront or, as a practical matter c [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:19 pm
As a practical matter, it is hard to say that the underlying DNA report is not being used for its truth. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 12:42 pm
As a practical matter, it is hard to say that the underlying DNA report is not being used for its truth. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 12:27 pm
(e) Electrophoresis: Here at last we have the performance of the test that matters. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:45 am
Illinois, the Court will consider whether there’s a Crawford violation when one witness testifies about the results of DNA testing performed by a different analyst. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 8:33 pm
Professor Friedman draws attention to several articles: Here is a link to a piece on it by Erwin Chemerinsky, and here is a link to an Op Ed piece in the New York Times by Jeff Fisher (counsel for Crawford). [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:56 am
Jan Crawford on Herman Cain leaving the Presidential race. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 7:31 pm
It does matter. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 7:54 am
In 2004 in Crawford v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:20 am
The Tennessee Court of Appeals issued an opinion on its relatively new certificate of merit rule in Crawford v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:55 pm
Sibylle Scheipers (Oxford 2010) The Treatment of Combatants and Insurgents under the Law of Armed Conflict Emily Crawford (Oxford 2010) Civilian or Combatant? [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 4:27 am
She subsequently reported the matter to the police. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 6:50 am
There was a further meeting between them and Crawford on 14 January 1991, when Crawford repeated much of what he had said on 3 January. [read post]
