Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 521 - 540
of 14,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2014, 6:43 pm
An interesting matter in copyright law is brought up in the post How the Library of Congress got caught up in a Mark Twain plagiarism scandal An independent scholar, Kevin Mac Donnell, whose sleuthing I’ve written about before, announced earlier this month on a Mark Twain web forum that he uncovered a hefty amount of plagiarism in Mark Twain’s America, an illustrated biography by Harry Katz and the Library of Congress, and published by Little,… [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:01 pm
Consequently, the trade mark "ECR-Award" disagreed with the DPMA and T was not lacking distinctiveness for the services covered in class 41 and disagreed with the differing assessment by the DPMA and the German Federal Patent Court, which had both had done exactly that - found that the mark ECR-Award was lacking distinctiveness for the services covered in class 41.Merpel cannot help but feel for the Examiners. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:40 am
Further to yet another unsuccessful appeal to the General Court (GC) (T-450/09), as mentioned, in 2016 the CJEU set aside the GC decision in its entirety and gave final ruling on the matter. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 7:03 am
This was unusual because the firm didn’t handle personal injury matters for plaintiffs or defendants. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:30 am
The name doesn't matter, but having it does. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
There might be gains from rethinking subject matter of TM law and non-subject matter. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 12:36 pm
Council, Inc., 435 U.S. 519, 555 (1978) (“[T]he role of a court in reviewing the sufficiency of an agency’s consideration of environmental factors is a limited one, limited both by the time at which the decision was made and by the statute mandating review. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:21 pm
(This later YouTube moment involving a Giannoulias campaign aide, coming hot on the heels of Bob Etheridge’s video meltdown, didn’t help matters.) [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 1:59 pm
It is not yet in effect, though, so don’t start relying on it yet. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:14 am
Backend matters such as Samsung’s content screening programme were also deemed irrelevant if they didn’t affect consumers’ end perception of the signs. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
Cadbury then appealed the decision against those two marks to the High Court, which handed down its decision this Summer.Justice Meade initially focused on the core cases that were argued to be central to the matter. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 1:30 am
Cadbury then appealed the decision against those two marks to the High Court, which handed down its decision this Summer.Justice Meade initially focused on the core cases that were argued to be central to the matter. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm
She cites proposed marks such as “Marijuana Cola” and “You Can’t Spell Healthcare Without THC,” which were rejected by the U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:14 am
Pet-Ag, Inc., Opposition No. 91170148 (November 22, 2011) [not precedential].Family of Marks: Abbott feebly argued that it owns a family of "-sure" marks (ENSURE, PEDIASURE, NEOSURE, and PROSURE), but that dog wouldn't hunt. [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 7:30 pm
These efforts have been met with vociferous dissents that are a marked departure from the rather staid statements of commissioners past. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
Mark was unable to see his family for long periods, and even when they visited, he couldn’t hold his children. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
Introduction: Mark McKenna: This is a conversation about what it means to be a TM and what it means to use matter in a way that violates a TM right. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:27 am
James Robertson of Marks & Clerk has written to the IPKat about an interesting copyright case in the US textbook publishing industry. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
For several months, I've generally congratulated prevailing lawyers in cases I write about, as a mark of acknowledgment of their professional success on behalf of their clients. [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 3:40 am
The Board upheld a refusal to register the proposed mark shown below for "first aid kits" [SURVIVAL disclaimed] on the ground that the supposed mark "would be perceived as merely informational matter and thus fails to function as a trademark" for the identified goods. [read post]
