Search for: "Matter of Murphy v Murphy" Results 521 - 540 of 935
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2015, 9:15 am
Beyond this, the question of what should constitute patentable subject matter will continue to be debated. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
   Similarly, Mr Justice Wilkie, in KXL v Murphy [2016] EWHC 3102 (QB), para 45, warned that the entire system of private international law could collapse if public policy was too readily invoked, and the public policy test should only succeed where the foreign provision caused undue hardship which would be ‘contrary to a fundamental principle of justice’. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
United States, which interpreted the Fourth Amendment to impose certain limits on the warrantless collection of the historical cell phone location records of a criminal suspect; (3) Murphy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:38 pm by Steven G. Pearl
UPS argued that 218.5 applied because the remedy under section 226.7 constitutes a wage under Murphy v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:43 am
With so little time in which to make their oral submissions to the Court of Justice, counsel had to resort to extreme measures to make their point At the time of posting this item, there's no sign of the Advocate General's keenly-awaited Opinion in Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd & Others v QC Leisure & Others, Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:37 am by Kluwer Blogger
And: ‘if the author was able to express his creative abilities in the production of the work by making free and creative choices’ (Football Association v Murphy). [read post]