Search for: "Merck and Co,"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2019, 11:01 am
Merck & Co, Inc., No. 18-2317, 2019 WL 4309663, 2019 U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
In our rather terse (due to firm involvement) post on Monday concerning Merck & Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 382 (08 April 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2011] EWHC 876 (QB) (08 April 2011) The Legal Services Commission v F & Ors [2011] EWHC 899 (QB) (08 April 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Moria & Anor v Bednash [2011] EWHC 839 (Ch) (08 April 2011) Batt v Royal Mail [2011] EWHC 900 (Ch) (08 April 2011) High Court (Administrative Court)… [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:55 am
See In re Merck & Co., Inc., 800 F.2d 1091,1097 (Fed. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:24 am
See id. at 426; In re Merck & Co., Inc., 800 F.2d 1091, 1097 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 5:15 am
Merck & Co. 890 F.3d 1231(Fed. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 1:05 pm
” Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:05 am
In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 1097 (Fed.Cir. 1986); In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981). [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:52 am
Co., 129 U.S. 530, 537 (1889)). [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 8:31 pm
Reports published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) based upon a review of materials disclosed by Merck & Co. in the course of the Vioxx litigation claim Merck & Co. frequently paid academic scientists to take credit for research articles prepared by company-hired medical writers, a practice called “ghostwriting”. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:31 pm
Dai (Finnegan Washington, D.C.) wrote a nice article about their take on IP in China for the WorldTrade Magazine called 'Policy Perspectives: The Current Reality with IP in China'.It includes a discription of the case Merck & Co. versus Henan Topfond Pharmaceutical Co., about a patent on a hair-loss drug, which illustrates the importance of pratical applicabililty in China's Patent Law: "Instead of risking infringement, Topfond challenged… [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 7:10 am
Merck recognized the need for a non-oxygen containing co-reactant process for thin film deposition. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:51 pm
According to the Order, Complainant Femina Pharma Incorporated (“Femina”) moved to compel Respondents Merck & Co., Inc., Schering Plough Corporation, Organon Inc., and N.V. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 7:33 am
In securities fraud cases, held the Court, facts showing scienter are among those that constitute the violation (Merck & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 5:21 am
Merck & Co., Inc., 913 A.2d 832, 833-34 (N.J.App.Div. 2007). [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm
The court ruled unanimously in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:48 pm
Of course, Merck & Co. failed to warn users of these increased risks in any of their advertisements. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 11:23 am
See Merck Co. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 7:17 am
In Merck & Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 8:41 am
Merck & Co., Inc., 888 F.3d 1231 (Fed. [read post]
