Search for: "Miller v. Deal"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2015, 5:03 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 2:34 pm
Miller, 2015 WL 1870058 (Tex. [read post]
2 May 2015, 4:11 am
” Florida v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Delta Construction Company v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:51 am
State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am
A deal was later struck under which Green’s emergency placement ended and his pay was reinstated; however, under the deal, Green would either have to retire, or take a demotion to a position in Wamsutter, Wyoming (pop: 451), which made up for the isolation with a $40,000 pay cut. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:25 pm
Five days later, in South Carolina Department of Social Services v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:39 am
In other news: Miller v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:33 am
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:28 am
” Wright & Miller §4423, at 612. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:47 pm
The basic legal question in the case is whether a juvenile who received a life-without-parole sentence prior to June 2012 may take advantage of the ruling that day in Miller v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Group, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
The first significant case after Miller is the well-known case of United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
Tracing the early legislative and judicial history of CEQA, the Court observed that its landmark Friends of Mammoth decision construing CEQA to apply to approvals of private projects noted that CEQA “deals…with questions of degree” and that “[f]urther legislative or administra [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 6:37 am
Miller v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:20 am
Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Miller (1939), a majority of the Kansas state senate brought suit to challenge the actions of the state executive branch in connection with the ratification of a proposed federal constitutional amendment dealing with child labor. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:03 pm
The case tests the potential retroactivity of the Court’s ruling in Miller v. [read post]
