Search for: "Minor v. Black"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,017
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2023, 4:34 am
For those that don't know what the + is for, it's for MAP (Minor Attracted Person aka: pedophile). [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:30 am
"But for every Elsie there is a Robert Harlan, light-skinned, straight-haired, who showed no interest in renouncing his blackness. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:14 am
In United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 6:53 pm
Bollinger and Grutter v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:21 am
Justice Harlan's dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:51 am
Although June Medical v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:10 am
The case is Black v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:22 pm
Karasik Seyfarth Synopsis: In Savage, et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 6:07 am
This case demonstrates how it all works.The case is Khanna v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 8:30 am
We have a Guardian Court of nine judges in black robes. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 3:00 pm
As Justice Samuel Alito commented in Fisher v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 4:25 am
Over here the UK Supreme Court gave judgment in Lee v Ashers in October following a hearing in May this year also deciding in favour of the baker. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 10:02 am
Black Entertainment Television) applied to music sampling. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm
The Supreme Court again reversed the defendants’ convictions in Norris v Alabama. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 5:39 am
Furthermore, while the owners of Sole Cleaning were not racialized minorities themselves, all of their staff were members of racialized minority groups. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:40 am
Claims of discrimination under Title VII are governed by a tripartite burden-shifting test established by McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:00 am
LGBTQ+ folks should be considered a discrete and insular minority implicating strict scrutiny for equal protection purposes.43. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:20 pm
" The two current cases are the predictable result of the 2005 decision Roper v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
In Hills v. [read post]
