Search for: "P. v. Mays" Results 521 - 540 of 19,810
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2008, 7:00 pm
Dynamex, Inc., supra, 166 Cal.App.4th at p. 1335; see also Sav-On Drug Stores, supra, 34 Cal.4th at p. 333 ["‘a class action is not inappropriate simply because each member of the class may at some point be required to make an individual showing as to his or her eligibility for recovery'"]; Bufil v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am by MBettman
On May 8 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Elliott-Thomas v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:48 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
LaSalle Hotel Operating P’ship, L.P., 380 F.3d 126, 132 (2d Cir. 2004). (...)Precedent guides that if BB&B’s advertising state- ment is literally false, it may be actionable “without reference to the advertisement’s impact on the buying public. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 7:25 pm by Florian Mueller
Third parties like Valve may, howevever, seek protection of some of their sales data.The order says "[p]ublic access shall be by way of telephone access. [read post]