Search for: "Penny v. Penny" Results 521 - 540 of 1,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2010, 8:19 pm by Eric Turkewitz
I know, I know, that sounds even dumber than the claim of being fired for being too sexy, but it’s true, he actually did make such claims as I wrote about a year ago: Empire State Building v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm
Another method for checking tread depth is to place a penny in the tread with Lincoln's head upside down and facing you. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
Patent 4,910,652.[1] The reexamination was  initiated in April 2000 on behalf of Casio Computer by the now long defunct law firm of Pennie & Edmonds. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:38 pm
Another method for checking tread depth is to place a penny in the tread with Lincoln's head upside down and facing you. [read post]
25 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
In very high-profile cases (e.g., Bush v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:00 am by Alejandro Manevich
Yet in Frank et al. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:09 am by Brad Kuhn
  The property owner claimed the offer was "pennies on the dollar. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 5:37 pm
the biggest and most interesting salvo in the tech v. telecom fight is Google's potential bid for wireless spectrum, and its rumored development of wireless handsets.... [read post]