Search for: "People v Baker"
Results 521 - 540
of 936
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2023, 5:58 am
[I only count two votes to ratify Big Tech's sweeping immunity claims] The Supreme Court's oral argument in Gonzalez v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
The district court granted the request for expert witness fees, but denied the personnel expense request finding that the phrase “all the expenses of the proceedings” was not specific and explicit to include such expenses due to the presumption under the “American Rule” that litigants pay their own attorneys’ fees (quoting Baker Botts L.L.P. v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm
Oliver Brown fue un personaje secundario, un nombre más entre un grupo de casi doscientos reclamantes que habían sido seleccionados para litigar por la NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), una organización creada en 1909 para promover los derechos de los negros. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know
7 Nov 2022, 7:24 am
Vitale (1962), Baker v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:36 am
Supreme Court, in Shinn v. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
On 5 November 2019 Steyn J handed down judgment in the case of Hemming v Baker [2019] EWHC 2950 (QB). [read post]
26 May 2019, 4:01 am
Kirk v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:09 pm
Baker & Hostetler LLP v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:39 pm
A Washington Lawyer Salary Survey Money v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:34 am
Duffy was co-counsel in the important Supreme Court case KSR v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
EEOC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
Its name is Ajinomoto Sweeteners Europe SAS v Asda Stores Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 609 and it's a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sedley LJ, Rimer LJ and Sir Scott Baker) last Wednesday, 2 June.Asda (the British embodiment of Walmart) sold its own health food products, some of which were labelled with appealing little phrases like "No hidden nasties" and "No artificial colours or flavours and no aspartame". [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 7:00 am
And, in State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 3:30 am
And then the DOJ took a heel turn in Zarda v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:47 pm
Baker says the difference is the product - speech v. nonspeech. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:24 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 12:07 pm
Jones also credited the argument that Baker v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 7:22 am
Brown v. [read post]
