Search for: "People v. David"
Results 521 - 540
of 5,958
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2022, 2:08 pm
by David Hricik, Mercer Law School Judge Albright granted Google’s motion to transfer venue under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) from the Western District of Texas to the Northern District of California in an opinion in Motion Offense LLC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Casey, now overruled by Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
” Kant may have believed that a system could be designed that would force even devils, as “rational actors,” to serve the public good, but few people agree. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:11 am
See, e.g., Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
The Fourth Circuit's recent decision in Washington Post v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
In overturning Roe v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 4:30 pm
From yesterday's U.S. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:52 am
On the other side are cases like Rumsfeld v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
[This is a 6k+ word blog post that was joyless to write and most likely will be joyless to read.] [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
[1] Sanford Levinson, Our Undemocratic Constitution: Where the Constitution Goes Wrong (And How We the People Can Correct It) (2008). 7 [2] Id [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 12:10 pm
David Alan Sklansky (Stanford University) has posted The Neglected Origins of the Hearsay Rule in American Slavery: Recovering Queen v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
Under People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 9:30 pm
David Alan Sklansky, Stanford Law School, has posted The Neglected Origins of the Hearsay Rule in American Slavery: Recovering Queen v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
In 2007, Christina Romer and David Romer, professors of economics at the University of California Berkeley, conducted a study to determine the impact of legislated tax changes on the economy. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Maryland, Martin v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:30 am
David Landau & Rosalind Dixon, Dobbs, Democracy, and Dysfunction Few recent decisions of the Supreme Court have received as much popular attention as Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:43 am
Fifty years ago, in Wisconsin v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Sometimes the heavens fall when people blindly follow rules that no longer serve their original purposes; sometimes the heavens fall when people insouciantly break rules that seem inconvenient at the moment. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:37 am
See David R. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
He conceded, however, that in the case of a chancel screen of some intrinsic interest in itself, the act of removing it and re-erecting it elsewhere has some of the characteristics of removing a chattel to another location; and that this made it appropriate to consider, as what he termed “a subsidiary issue”, the extent to which the screen is “part of the heritage and history not only of the church, but also of all the people, present and [read post]
