Search for: "People v. Job"
Results 521 - 540
of 9,869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Putting aside rights that arise from contractual or other state-law guarantees of academic freedom, if a public employee is speaking (even on matters of public concern) while on the job, qua employee, then under the 2006 Supreme Court Garcetti v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 9:30 pm
It does a pretty good job and has a comparative advantage in allocating most ordinary things, given that there are other things that have to be allocated in more egalitarian ways” (OI, v.1, 347). [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
People with access to high-quality information will get ahead. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:51 pm
People with common names, who are not household names, simply cannot. [read post]
8 May 2023, 10:32 am
Some recent exciting challenges include R(Ncube) v Brighton and Hove City Council (2021) EWHC 578 (Admin), Uduezue v Bexley LBC (2023) EWCA Civ 322, and R (Cort) v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 7:53 am
However, many people do not fully understand what this warning means. [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:00 am
In one recent federal district court opinion, Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
I was genuinely surprised when he offered me a job. [read post]
6 May 2023, 4:00 am
In addition, many people employed by one company are, in fact, on the job doing work for another. [read post]
5 May 2023, 12:04 pm
The resulting federal court victory in Thompson v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
That women are the peculiar bearers of America’s constitutional failings seems obvious after Dobbs v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:49 am
Back when Chief Justice John Roberts questioned how diversity would contribute an educational benefit to physics during oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
In the landmark case of Citizens United v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Child labor laws exist to ensure that when young people work, the job does not jeopardize their health, well-being or education,” added Garnett-Civils. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:30 am
Allemand did a really good job of highlighting the different legal cases that brought out change and introduced us to the different lawyers who argued those cases. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:05 am
So why do smart people who should certainly know better put in the effort to try to get this zombie amendment to walk again? [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:39 am
Colombia’s government saw an opportunity in remote workers like these who could stimulate the economy on an ongoing basis without adding competition to the local job market. [read post]
1 May 2023, 2:50 pm
The CFO denied through his legal counsel doing anything illegal (See proceedings from Oakland County, People of the State of Michigan v Brian Michael White CR #2021-276874-FH). [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:57 am
In our democracy, Madison argued, “[t]he people, not the government, possess the absolute sovereignty,” and the people must be free to criticize those who govern them. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:30 am
Apple FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms) judgment in Optis v. [read post]
