Search for: "People v. Steel" Results 521 - 540 of 624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Do we have people thinking about how to sue Fox News, pundits, and political candidates for their lies? [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt)   Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:17 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Doctors and hospitals could exclude people from consuming health care without paying, simply by refusing to provide services. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 2:57 pm
People often refer to the THREE PILLARS of the European Union. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 9:17 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Specifically, the Act is aimed at raising awareness of wage gaps that affect women, Indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities and members of visible minorities. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am by Paul Rosenzweig, Vishnu Kannan
That framework saw an executive far more subservient to the legislative branch and far more ministerial in nature (George Washington’s entire executive branch numbered fewer than 100 people). [read post]