Search for: "Perez v Perez"
Results 521 - 540
of 2,131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2017, 12:17 pm
In contrast, in Marlow v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 8:06 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 6:15 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:15 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:11 pm
Bank Court Cannot Hold a Municipal Court in Contempt In Re Perez 220 B.R. 216 (Bankr. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 3:01 am
Senate’s Roy Moore perplex [Matt Kwong, CBC] And my Twitter thread on the signed yearbook that figures in Monday’s allegations went viral; Time to end it: “Low-Income Housing Tax Credit: Costly, Complex, and Corruption-Prone” [Chris Edwards and Vanessa Brown Calder, Cato] “When Statutes Conflict, Agencies Shouldn’t Get to Pick Which One They Like More” [Ilya Shapiro, Cato on Cato certiorari amicus in Chevron deference case of Perez-Guzman… [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 5:09 am
The opinion is styled, Antonio Perez v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:18 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 12:46 pm
See Perez v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 5:20 pm
The petition of the day is: Perez-Guzman v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:27 pm
I've made mistakes like this one in a blog post before. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 6:34 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:12 pm
What Happens When Only One Spouse Adopts a Child in Arizona The Arizona Court of Appeals-Division One reviewed and rendered a decision in Doty-Perez v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 7:17 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Perez, a summary order decided on October 11. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 6:14 am
., and Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 6:34 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 6:29 am
See Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:49 am
The city had improperly regarded the AUPRs as FLSA-exempt until 2013 (at which time it reclassified them); it could not claim a custom or practice was reached regarding application of the FLSA while denying that the statute applied to them, the court reasoned (Perez v. [read post]
