Search for: "Poole v. United States" Results 521 - 540 of 1,428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 9:50 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994), this Court held that such adjudicative property exactions violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution as uncompensated takings unless an "essential nexus" exists between the property exaction and a legitimate state interest, and the property exaction is "roughly proportional" to the projected impact of the development. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:28 am by Jon
An amendment should specifically overturn Kohl v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
In television interviews she was out of her depth in a shallow pool. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:51 am by Leland E. Beck
  Judge Wilkins, of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, threw out litigation alleging the “public trust” doctrine as a predicate to mandating federal rulemaking to restrict greenhouse gases in Alec L. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
"It is that time of year again when IP's great and good pool together at Fordham Law School near Columbus Circle in Manhattan to debate, learn and have fun", says the AmeriKat in her first kat-post from the Fordham Conference 2016. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:02 pm
United States (1969 Trade Cases ¶72,730) and United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm by Heather Douglas
” – Justice Scalia in Holland v Illinois. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 1:12 pm by Schachtman
., 644 F.3d 604 (8th Cir. 2011), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit rejected the defendant’s argument that a “full and conclusive” Rule 702 gatekeeping procedure was required before a trial court could certify a class action under the Federal Rules. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:51 pm
Lead paint lawsuits are not as common as other product liability lawsuits, like defective toys or unsafe drugs, but they still affect families all over the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 2:58 am by Florian Mueller
Both parties have been granted leave to file pleadings until then.Unlike the situation between IP Bridge and OPPO, the IP Bridge v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 12:01 am by Florian Mueller
-internal antisuit injunction (an instrument of which some United States Senators are, or pretend to be, blissfully ignorant) that would bar Philips from enforcing a U.S. import ban. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:11 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeNew York-Based LLC Awarded $3,000 for Legal Costs Incurred in State Court Action's Improper RemovalArabesque v. [read post]