Search for: "Range v. Attorney General United States"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2024, 8:29 am
By Helen Boone According to Walter Lehmann, out of the 35,000 museums in the United States, only 50 maintain in-house counsel.[1] For those institutions without a lawyer on staff, it can be difficult to determine when a problem requires legal attention. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:59 am
United States [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
In addition to evoking memories of a time when congressional relief for unauthorized migrants was more possible, United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
That presumption quite general and is not the type passed by some state legislatures following the outbreak of the COVID-19 virus. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
This claim is contradicted by a wide range of authoritative legal sources—and were it correct, would lead to absurd consequences. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:31 am
United States (Halkbank) that may make it easier to prosecute foreign sovereign entities, while leaving some thorny questions of immunities unresolved. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 1:31 pm
United States, Dubin asks the justices to provide clarity on this issue, which he says has now split nine of the 13 circuit courts of appeals. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 9:22 am
United States, 581 U.S., 137 S. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 1:35 pm
Attorney General Stuart M. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
The statute itself explains the punishment ranges for violation of the federal illegal reentry law as: (1) whose removal was subsequent to a conviction for commission of three or more misdemeanors involving drugs, crimes against the person, or both, or a felony (other than an aggravated felony), such alien shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both; (2) whose removal was subsequent to a conviction for… [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
P. 60(b)(6); (4) whether a reasonable jurist could believe that the Texas Attorney General made material misrepresentations that constitute a fraud on the court; (5) whether imposition of the death penalty in this case was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
United States (relisted [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
This question—and the case behind it, McCreary County v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:35 am
State v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:40 pm
Louis v. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 7:11 am
One of these cases reached the Supreme Court in 2012 in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
Instead, it is a generic provision that sweeps in a wide range of conduct. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
United States 14-1535Issue: (1) Whether prosecutors are permitted to withhold materials covered by Brady v. [read post]
