Search for: "Responding to Negative Online Reviews"
Results 521 - 540
of 841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2016, 10:48 am
Last week, I blogged about a suspicious-looking strategy in an online libel case: Matthew Chan (a Georgia resident) posted on Yelp (and on some other sites) a negative review of Mitul Patel, a Suwanee, Ga., dentist. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 10:22 am
If suit against the user is successful, they are entitled to leave the reviews posted; they can empower the users to decide whether the reviews remain online; or they can effect the removal unilaterally. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 8:22 pm
How Lawyers Should Respond to Online Complaints & Negative Reviews 1. [read post]
13 Aug 2016, 8:22 pm
Lastly, many firms to not respond to any reviews, either positive or negative, on Facebook. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Online survey of 1000 respondents, who saw 18 images/2 videos. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
The settlement agreements had reciprocal negative keyword obligations for 1-800 Contacts. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
However, it is worth noting that the ASCAP/BMI consent decree review started before Hesse took over as head of the Antitrust Division from Bill Baer. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm
WHY IS IT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST FOR THE PUBLIC TO BE ABLE TO REVIEW TRUMP'S TAX RETURNS? [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 3:08 pm
Kodak created a digital camera, invested in the technology, and even understood that photos would be shared online. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
Still, despite the abundance and convenience of online review sites like Yelp, TripAdvisor, Google+, and Angie’s List, many consumers are reluctant to share negative experiences on these sites. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
Still, despite the abundance and convenience of online review sites like Yelp, TripAdvisor, Google+, and Angie’s List, many consumers are reluctant to share negative experiences on these sites. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:30 am
However, as recapped by the judge, ConsumerAffairs’ alleged operations sound odious (these are allegations; and paragraph returns added for clarity): (i) Consumer Affairs conspicuously characterizes customer reviews of the products and services offered by paying accredited members as “Reviews and Complaints” whereas it equally conspicuously characterizes the reviews of other entities’ products and services as “Complaints and… [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:08 am
The Division’s staff[8] did not respond directly to counsel’s request for concurrence. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 1:46 pm
My negative review disappears from the Internet. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:19 pm
The IT Companies support the European Commission and EU Member States in the effort to respond to the challenge of ensuring that online platforms do not offer opportunities for illegal online hate speech to spread virally. [read post]
28 May 2016, 5:25 am
Department of Health and Human Services], said health professionals responding to online reviews can speak generally about the way they treat patients but must have permission to discuss individual cases. [read post]
11 May 2016, 3:53 pm
Bouattia's discrimination claim -- to wit, that she was using it to respond (or perhaps more accurately, avoid responding) to another discrimination claim. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:48 am
The DOL has prepared and posted a list of the changes, and that list can be found online. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:48 am
The DOL has prepared and posted a list of the changes, and that list can be found online. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm
The insurance-buying community has responded enthusiastically, as noted in online reports of year-on-year growth of cyber-risk insurance premiums.[1] But how much third-party liability protection are insureds really getting from these new cyber-risk insurance products? [read post]
