Search for: "Robert D. Thomas" Results 521 - 540 of 2,408
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2017, 7:49 am
" There's then some byplay about "laying" versus "lying," with the punchline "If he was laying we'd be bitched. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:38 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justices Gorsuch and Breyer are not two jurists we'd usually put together. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 10:18 am by Ajay Sarma, Christiana Wayne
Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Dmitri Alperovitch sat down with Deputy National Security Advisor for Cyber and Emerging Technology Anne Neuberger to discuss the Biden administration's cybersecurity strategy: Erica D. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:54 am
Roberts's goals of narrow opinions and consensus must be viewed in the context of constraining Kennedy—not constraining Thomas and Scalia, as some have suggested. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 7:20 am
They do not join the Thomas/Scalia concurrence reiterating disagreement with Casey.5) About 2 pages of the slip opinion explain that some women come to regret having abortions, and that there will be fewer such women if they know what an intact D & E (i.e., "partial birth abortion") involves. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am by Guest Blogger
Bush 4 D MR Thomas 2009 Obama 1 D D Clinton 1 2011 Obama 2 D D Clinton 2 2013 Obama 3 D D Clinton 3 2015 Obama 4 R MD Clinton 4 2017 Trump 1 R R G.W. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 4:10 am by Amy Howe
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr criticizes last week’s article in The New York Times on recent studies that analyze overlap between the Court’s opinions and briefs submitted to the Court in those cases; the article cited Justice Clarence Thomas as having the highest “overlap” rate among the Justices in the Roberts Court era. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 6:50 am by Nabiha Syed
Robert Barnes of the Washington Post compares the application of originalist principles to the case by Justices Scalia and Thomas, while at the Miami Herald, Cal Thomas criticizes the ruling, contending that the Justices “live in an unreal world. [read post]